tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.comments2022-04-09T04:39:43.869+08:00Music and Arts : 音樂與藝術theorydavidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15334047781909883772noreply@blogger.comBlogger62125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-80409847041550444712020-12-31T21:41:02.093+08:002020-12-31T21:41:02.093+08:00謝謝你的撰寫。謝謝你的撰寫。Morihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17384630419703604326noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-27801437610028861752013-01-06T22:13:39.763+08:002013-01-06T22:13:39.763+08:00我不禁要反省一下我的four part writing= =
很同意spencer=)我不禁要反省一下我的four part writing= =<br />很同意spencer=)mei lingnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-80177953163674482302011-08-22T10:46:29.275+08:002011-08-22T10:46:29.275+08:00Thank you for your reminders. Yes. It is typing er...Thank you for your reminders. Yes. It is typing error. The heading was newly addded but the contents was old.<br /><br />It seems that this kind of article at least has been read by someone. <br /><br />That's sound great<br /><br />Leung Sirtheorydavidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15334047781909883772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-24738390117145656752011-08-22T01:38:36.519+08:002011-08-22T01:38:36.519+08:00I've found a typo! It should be Glenn Gould,ri...I've found a typo! It should be Glenn Gould,right?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-83394773603238958962011-08-05T22:53:29.075+08:002011-08-05T22:53:29.075+08:00Thank for your encouragement. It is rather difficu...Thank for your encouragement. It is rather difficult to teach such course. HK Students usually only want to get a diploma, more than that of acquiring new knowledge and skill. <br /><br />Frankly, this course is almost suspended due to insufficient enrollment (even cannot make 5 students). Fortunately, an old friend student called me and we can make it seven. <br /><br />I am really afraid that I will lose the most valuable knowledge that I acquired in those postgraduate study years in the future, after numerous teachings of the low level examination-focus classes. <br /><br />David Leungtheorydavidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15334047781909883772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-28572260554610046832011-08-04T00:35:10.728+08:002011-08-04T00:35:10.728+08:00對學生果然係一個好極好的消息!我記得當年是在讀master 時才有機會學習 Schenkerian ...對學生果然係一個好極好的消息!我記得當年是在讀master 時才有機會學習 Schenkerian Analysis,是一個很有實效的音樂分析取向!亦的確我沒有在其他的私人機構看到過有同樣的課程!<br /><br />Leung Sir 肯為學生開辦這實效而不算流行的課程,實在是學生之福!Spencer Chanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08677188739497071170noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-53542210359514773692011-06-11T00:13:34.596+08:002011-06-11T00:13:34.596+08:00聽者的修養是重點,寫的的修養是重點,兩者的相互影響更是重點。聽者的修養是重點,寫的的修養是重點,兩者的相互影響更是重點。野人https://www.blogger.com/profile/14146155531595236944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-77965881351652649432011-04-07T16:49:28.466+08:002011-04-07T16:49:28.466+08:00有興趣, 請留位。Jennifer有興趣, 請留位。JenniferJenniferhttp://jenniferip2005@hotmail.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-5780978736092847612011-04-04T11:54:05.398+08:002011-04-04T11:54:05.398+08:00一時不慎,誤將john cage 的 4'33" 寫成 4'3"...一時不慎,誤將john cage 的 4'33" 寫成 4'3",抱歉!Spencer Chanhttp://flute-music-teacher.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-19494154219605467662011-04-03T02:24:42.671+08:002011-04-03T02:24:42.671+08:00要被規矩玩謝了,才有新意出來。創新是穿越,是粉碎,是痛,是悲。要被規矩玩謝了,才有新意出來。創新是穿越,是粉碎,是痛,是悲。野人https://www.blogger.com/profile/14146155531595236944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-17867415959458437012011-03-31T21:50:45.338+08:002011-03-31T21:50:45.338+08:00David, thank you for your continued hard work paid...David, thank you for your continued hard work paid in the chorus, your passion for music and seriously, does affect us! LYAngelinahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10060741917055765153noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-1712195413465288272011-03-22T11:22:43.238+08:002011-03-22T11:22:43.238+08:00所言甚是!就正如我們中國人說中文時,雖不會理會文法,但這並不代表我們可以不合文法,只是作為中國人,文...所言甚是!就正如我們中國人說中文時,雖不會理會文法,但這並不代表我們可以不合文法,只是作為中國人,文法已牢牢印在心中,隨心而發便可說出合文法的說話吧。我們雖沒有刻意使用文法,但其實已是根據文法去說我們的說話,絕不能將「我愛你」說成是「我你愛」。<br /><br />無論樂器還是樂理、作曲、編曲,我們都應將rules 熟練到可以隨心而發才去講feel。Spencer Chanhttp://flute-music-teacher.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-37097919523668761062011-03-01T11:22:45.146+08:002011-03-01T11:22:45.146+08:00很好的參考文章,呃要精僻!很好的參考文章,呃要精僻!Spencer Chanhttp://flute-music-teacher.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-32311464254206302382011-01-31T00:08:56.382+08:002011-01-31T00:08:56.382+08:00Frankly, my separating of ideas into several essay...Frankly, my separating of ideas into several essays is inspirated by wild-man and you. That's good. When I start writign every essay, I have the complete idea in advance. The problem is that my writing is too fast to avoid any grammatical errors and lacking of original sources (citation). If any student just want to copy-and-paste, sorry, he/she will lose.......Traps are placed in every essay. If they only want to get some ideas in order to develop their own term papers, that is all right.theorydavidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15334047781909883772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-75319612135326531532011-01-30T00:24:38.229+08:002011-01-30T00:24:38.229+08:00ET喜歡酒心,那正好!ET喜歡酒心,那正好!野人https://www.blogger.com/profile/14146155531595236944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-43196555951965367972011-01-29T21:39:44.728+08:002011-01-29T21:39:44.728+08:00野人:
未病好已吃了不少。ET喜酒心的。謝!
關於你問DAVID的問題,我也有想過,但記性好的他有幾...野人:<br />未病好已吃了不少。ET喜酒心的。謝!<br />關於你問DAVID的問題,我也有想過,但記性好的他有幾篇文章還是有頭有尾的。BTnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-84972280133698666572011-01-29T21:30:27.743+08:002011-01-29T21:30:27.743+08:00看到David那些魚和題記就想起《莊子‧逍遙遊》。題得好呢。
David,你開咁多系列文章,唔驚爛...看到David那些魚和題記就想起《莊子‧逍遙遊》。題得好呢。<br /><br />David,你開咁多系列文章,唔驚爛尾?<br /><br />BT,病好請你們食朱古力!ET都有:D野人https://www.blogger.com/profile/14146155531595236944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-31133188447549207902011-01-28T19:30:13.515+08:002011-01-28T19:30:13.515+08:00病了,多日沒有上來進修,怎料多了很多東西!右方的魚兒很可愛啊!
BT喜魚兒。
ET喜日出。病了,多日沒有上來進修,怎料多了很多東西!右方的魚兒很可愛啊!<br />BT喜魚兒。<br />ET喜日出。T'snoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-41078770717170356022011-01-26T01:11:59.901+08:002011-01-26T01:11:59.901+08:00說對了,Leung Sir 也要吃飯,所以要開此免費版聯絡各方好友,又順便寫文自娛,兼造益學生,免得...說對了,Leung Sir 也要吃飯,所以要開此免費版聯絡各方好友,又順便寫文自娛,兼造益學生,免得自己多年所學的忘記了 (現在已忘記了很多)。不過,對於文化工業所帶來的問題,我的座祐銘就是: 竭盡所能,態度認真,對甚麼類形市場就作甚麼人。對蕭才子,就寫深一點,對AT 妹妹,就寫淺一點。theorydavidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15334047781909883772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-76807801662780196132011-01-25T14:14:26.663+08:002011-01-25T14:14:26.663+08:00文人的老毛病發:自命清高。難度版主不用吃飯?不,不吃飯就沒有此版了。文人的老毛病發:自命清高。難度版主不用吃飯?不,不吃飯就沒有此版了。馬noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-79763551651454603872011-01-25T13:51:11.574+08:002011-01-25T13:51:11.574+08:00別忘記,合唱版的「寫作」某程度上是命題作文,先天就有不足,而後天又缺了點氧氣......總之跟那些數...別忘記,合唱版的「寫作」某程度上是命題作文,先天就有不足,而後天又缺了點氧氣......總之跟那些數字題目能結成有機體,那就不錯了。野人https://www.blogger.com/profile/14146155531595236944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-99578196657836772011-01-25T11:44:09.882+08:002011-01-25T11:44:09.882+08:001. 完全同意這 conclusion: "這其實是一個關於創作態度的問題;也是「文化工業...1. 完全同意這 conclusion: "這其實是一個關於創作態度的問題;也是「文化工業」引起的問題。" 不過話得說回頭,為何我們的合唱版歌曲音樂部份的編寫,在我的聽朵"看"來,也是 "可寫性" 不高?<br /><br />2. 我視音樂"作品" ,musical work, 內裡包含 texts 和 paratexts,但沒想過 text equal to work。<br />在 Woody 的例子,harp 的聲音(text, 文本)和情節(paratext -- harp music 的非音樂部份)是相互相成的,缺一則意義不完整。<br />當然,音樂很麻煩。很多人認為 music 是可以抽離任何相關非音樂性的參巧而獨立存在。<br /><br />3. 我想過一個就 music 有關文本的問題,就是: 應該視 "音樂" 聲音為文本嗎? 還是樂譜 "score" 為文本嗎? score上是有很多 paratext 的。後來,我選擇了sound,因為經設計的 sound 也是有一個既定的framework 給聽眾 follow 的。<br /><br />4. 我正在考慮將電影音樂作品中的非樂音部份稱為hypertext -- 近似internet世界裡的hyperlink,可能比借用文學理論上的term 更易 modified for my own use.<br /><br />5. 看來我忘記有些像 ET 的家姊的讀者會看。看來要寫番一些正路啦。不竟這篇電影音樂的文章帶有一定程度的實驗性。不是完全可取。theorydavidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15334047781909883772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-21070465322893443822011-01-25T02:29:40.936+08:002011-01-25T02:29:40.936+08:00這篇遠比上篇深呢。而這篇完全是epitext,大家沒必要讀。David你最好在標題上加上"...這篇遠比上篇深呢。而這篇完全是epitext,大家沒必要讀。David你最好在標題上加上"外篇",免得BT一類的人看了反而胡塗。<br /><br />你對結構主義的理解,似乎和在下的是不同的,或者因為在下讀的是文學的部分,應用的方向不一樣。<br /><br />其實現在討論的是paratext可不可能獨立自足而成為"work";或者說到底我們可不可能視之為作品。而叧一個重要的引申是到底paratext在作為paratext時是否比單獨看為"work"更有存在價值。<br /><br />而在下的一個小結是,繼續借用羅蘭.巴特的觀點:「可寫性」高的文本,其價值亦高---電影配樂之所以比不上歌刻音樂,主要在其「可寫性」不高。這其實是一個關於創作態度的問題;也是「文化工業」引起的問題。野人https://www.blogger.com/profile/14146155531595236944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-90279800513616453722011-01-25T00:17:29.651+08:002011-01-25T00:17:29.651+08:001. 「難得有人真得用心看」,我倒說:
難得有個SITE的每一篇文章吸引我用心看。那麼清晰的精讀文章...1. 「難得有人真得用心看」,我倒說:<br />難得有個SITE的每一篇文章吸引我用心看。那麼清晰的精讀文章,不看就太浪費了。<br />2. 本來上一篇顯淺易明的,為了讓野人明白,我反而要花更多精神明白這篇的「艱深」詞語。BTnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7061534489530460113.post-69646055352158402082011-01-24T00:13:06.945+08:002011-01-24T00:13:06.945+08:00讀了,在明與不明之間。讀了,在明與不明之間。野人https://www.blogger.com/profile/14146155531595236944noreply@blogger.com