This short article is transferred from Mark Evan Bonds' discussion on Berlioz's ground breaking work. Hope you can enjoy reading it. I have a few editings dropped on it.
Article:
Berlioz – Receptive History of Symphonie Fantastique
All three of Berlioz’s symphonies are programmatic to varying
degrees. The first of them, Symphonie
fantastique of 1830, as already mentioned, is based on a detailed program
of Berlioz’s own invention. Inspired by the composer’s infatuation with an
actress named Harriet Smithson, the program relates the increasing emotional
turmoil of a young musician as he realizes the woman he loves is spurning him. The
emotional trajectory of the symphony is thus almost the reverse of Beethoven’s
Ninth. Beethoven’s symphony moves from a turbulent first movement to a joyous
finale; the Symphonie fantastique, in
contrasts, moves from a joyous first movement, which evokes of the young
musician’s first infatuation, to a dark finale, labeled “Dream of a Witches’
Sabbath,” which evokes the image of the musician’s beloved dancing demonically
at his funeral. The sound of the Dies
irae, (“Day of Wrath”) from the well-known plainchant Mass for the Dead
within the finale serves as a dark counterpoint to Beethoven’s theme for the
vocal setting of Schiller’s “Ode to Joy” in the finale of the Ninth. Instead of
a vision of heaven, we are given a vision of hell and the triumph of evil.
Not everyone found Berlioz’s program for his Symphonie fantastique helpful. Robert Schumann, in an otherwise
favorable review of the work, argued that the movement titles alone would have
been sufficient, and that “word of mouth would have served to hand down the
more circumstantial account, which would certainly arouse interest because of
the personality of the composer, who lived through the vents of the symphony
himself.” German listeners in particular, Schumann argued, disliked having
their thoughts “so rudely directed,” all the more so given their “delicacy of
feeling and aversion to personal revelation” But Berlioz, Schumann
rationalized, “was writing primarily for his French compatriots, who are not
greatly impressed by refinements of modesty. I can imagine them, leaflet in
hand, reading and applauding their countryman who has depicted it all so well;
the music by itself does not interest them.”
Berlioz’s handling of the orchestra was also unusually forward
looking for 1830. At the beginning of the Symphonie
fantastique, for example, he calls for the high winds to play pp, then ppp, and then to decrescendo, presumably to an inaudible level. And
in the fourth movement, the “March to the Scaffold”, he introduces a brass
sound never before heard in the concert hall: massive, forceful, and
rhythmically charged. Berlioz also peppers his scores with instructions of a
hitherto unknown specificity. In the Symphonie
fantastique, for example, he marked exactly what kind of stick head – wood,
leather, or felt – percussionists should use in any given passage. Previously
this kind of choice would have been up to the individual performer.
David Leung (Leung Sir, theorydavid)
2012-08-30 published